Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Do your results make sense with respect to the theory? Objective, procedure, experimental results and the conclusion, which tells the reader. Department of English Writing Guide. Discussion The discussion section should explain to the reader the significance of the results and give a detailed account of what happened in the experiment. If you have difficulties with making your sentences readable, read over them aloud, noting the sentences that seem to be too long or are hard to read.
Repeat step 7 on the opposite side of the box. In science, you reason from what you know to what you don't know. University of Florida; Yellin, Linda L. Limitations Some study limitations merit comment. We are asking you to follow a specific. Be sure that you know which section or sections you were assigned to write in full.
You can improve this part of the report by 1 restating the hypothesis so that it more clearly and more specifically presents your educated guess of the outcomes of the experimental procedure and 2 enhancing the logic that you use to show how you have reasoned from what you know about the scientific concept to your hypothesis. Worse yet, each professor wants something a little different. Look to see that you make the necessary comparisons and that your explanations for the comparisons are full and logical. It may be more helpful to include words that help the reader follow the process of the experiment: step 1, step 2, step 3; first, then, finally; first, second, third; after, next, later, following; etc. If an experiment was within the tolerances, you can still account for the difference from the ideal. More particularly, focus your discussion with strategies like these: Compare expected results with those obtained.
If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each finding. Such a statement is typically a sentence or two. Usually this reasoning is based on what you know about the scientific concept of the lab and how that knowledge led you to the hypothesis. Ask him or her to identify places in the procedure that are not clear and then revise those places for greater clarity. Explain how the conclusion follows from the results.
Generally, this is enough; however, the conclusion might also be a place to discuss weaknesses of experimental design, what future work needs to be done to extend your conclusions, or what the implications of your conclusion are. You should write a direct, declarative, and succinct proclamation of the study results, usually in one paragraph. But if your aim is to demonstrate that your procedures are sound and that they legitimately lead to your results, then look at these sections of the report. Possible reasons for significant discrepancies are suggested and specific. Describe the steps you completed during your investigation.
A laboratory report can be used for several purposes. It is therefore unlikely that the water main pipe break was the result of sulfide-induced corrosion. Next, write the summary text to support your illustrative materials. Conclusion can be very short in most undergraduate laboratories. Results: The results section should include all tabulated data from observations during your experiment. Problems with the sufficiency of the explanation refer to the reader's judgment that you didn't include enough details in your explanation, that there wasn't enough of an explanation to satisfy the reader that you fully understood why the relationship between the results and hypothesis was what it was.
The format for your laboratory reports described below is a modification of the format. The sequence of this information is important; first state the answer, then the relevant results, then cite the work of others. Describe any observations you made, tabulate and discuss any data you. This part of the discussion should begin with a description of the unanticipated finding, followed by a brief interpretation as to why you believe it appeared and, if necessary, its possible significance in relation to the overall study. Purpose of a lab report; Format; Available resources. First, are you making a reasonable judgment about whether or not the hypothesis is supported by the findings? Overall Aims of the Report: The student. These results are inconsistent with prior research indicating that interruptions negatively affect task performance.
For more help writing the Title,. You need to provide greater depth in your explanation. A good introduction also provides whatever background theory, previous research, or formulas the reader needs to know. After the experiment is over, they write a formal report about their findings. Is your procedure described clearly enough? In these respects, a lab report is very much like a scientific paper, and should be.