Revenge has a way of relentlessly repeating itself as in interminable feuds, such as the Hatfields and McCoys —and ever more maliciously at that. Discarding me with a smirk. And that may mean that we don't hurt you at all if that's not a necessary part of your rehabilitation. Is it warning an official nursing board and recounting only the facts… Perhaps with an admitted personal opinion and perspective afterword trying to tie it all in. Comparison between Revenge and Vengeance: Revenge Vengeance Definition Oxford Dictionaries The action of hurting or harming someone in return for an injury or wrong suffered at their hands. Here are the 4 major points the 4th will irritate most no doubt, but Girard approached the Bible as historical literature, not sacred text. You perpetrator of the heinous act against an innocent family is barely investigated.
Revenge is an attempt to provide punishment for harm done to a person outside the law. Revenge certainly doesn't equate to justice. It is the same thing. The motive of revenge has mostly to do with expressing , hatred, or spite. Revenge is retaliation; seeking to harm someone who has harmed you. So, returning to my question, suppose you do what you are supposed to do, according to the norms of society and the law, and Justice is not served? Revenge is about pay back—it says that if we are hurt, then the perpetrator should feel the same amount of pain. We know this to be true from the laws passed to disenfranchise people based on their race, sex, etc.
She crossed boundaries, triangulated her closest loved ones with no remorse, eventually sending me on a spiral of mental unwellness and despair. This highlights that the main difference between justice and revenge stem from justice being the correct method of dealing with the problem and revenge being more focused on hurting the offender rather than gaining fairness. For a lot of people, lex talionis or revenge counts as justice. Not just when somebody has done something wrong, but always. His mother blamed him for everything and felt perfectly justified in abusing him over and over again. The amount of money paid for court costs and diversion programs, number of arrests and incarcerations, crime rate vs. Its sad you cant see it and you promote justice.
If you meet you wife's murderer on the street and kick him in the shins really hard, that is not revenge in my opinion. In every society, there is a system of justice. In other words, it may seem morally wrong to some to kill for any reason. The paradox is, naturally, that Christians worship a God who is the greatest avenger of them all. When we lock certain people up, is it merely to prevent them from doing it again, or is it punishment? In adversary, the burden of proof rests on the accuser whereas in the inquisitorial the burden of proof rests on noone ….
Emotional people blur the lines but faulty perception aside, justice is based on the laws that govern land not the whims of an individual. It is more personal, less concerned with justice and more about retaliation by inflicting harm. Playing by the rules and using a legal means to hopefully enact investigation that at the least will put her liscense and perhaps character under scrutiny. Strength and survival despite the odds. . These aggressive characteristics, his basically flawed and violent personality framework, is not only in reaction to what he did.
Although your definition actually has a lot of theoretical relevance to our present National Situation, I'm not sure it is relevant to the personal situation I outlined. Revenge is, by nature, personal; justice is impersonal, impartial, and both a social and legal phenomenon. The Book of Romans says that God uses governments to enact justice. The desire to repay an injury or wrong. However, justice and revenge are different from one another. In fact, many people use them interchangeably, and while they are not wrong, it should be noted that the two words have different connotations and are used in different situations.
For many, justice is not savage enough for their liking and they often take the law into their own hands. With revenge, the person doing it feels better, but society as a whole is weakened because the rules that provide the framework for the punishments are no longer needed. But the whims of the individual created the laws. Where do we find justice? A lawyer is selected as your advocate. Degrading another only ends up further degrading oneself. When you are so distraught that it's eating you from the inside out and you already crippled life is swirling down the drain and you are powerless to stop it or do anything besides sit paralyzed with your feelings, and try to assimilate the trauma and anguish you feel and the magnification of the hurt you feel because Justice has not been served and never will be. But Jesus said that was not right.
What are the key differences between the two? God does not smite the wicked with lightning bolts. You have raised a good point too. Criminal justice is the system of practices and institutions of governments directed at upholding social control, deterring and mitigating crime, and sanctioning those who violate laws with criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts. The protective instinct, and the fight or flight response is one of the most primal human responses to to personal safety and hundreds of articles elaborate of the long term damage to your body when high stress triggers the fight or flight response but without the physical and psychologically fulfillment that historically played out. Revenge is typically more personal. For a cheap candy bar? One hopes the law covers all the crimes and the punishments are appropriate for the crime but that is not always the case. Revenge is a far more personal matter.
To avenge is to punish a wrongdoing with the intent of seeing justice done. Justice takes extenuating circumstances into account. To be more specific, it refers to the process or result of using law fairly to judge and punish crimes and criminals. What makes it better, because more people are involved in the process? Justice refers to the process of law where the wrongdoers are judged and punished fairly. This system has not only been created by the members of a particular , but also has been agreed upon as the correct manner of handling.